top of page

Improving Efficiency In A Property Launch Process

Organisation

Hmlet (now known as Habyt)

Primary Role

Service Designer and Researcher

Project Type

Real estate, Operations, Service design

Date

4 Jun 2019

Secondary Role

-

Hmlet is a co-living company which subleases rooms in private apartments on a minimum stay basis of 3 months. Every apartment goes through the process of interior design and project management before it is ready for sale. As Asia’s fastest growing co-living company, it has grown from zero rooms in 2016 to ~2,500 rooms today across Singapore, Hong Kong, Tokyo and Sydney. With the injection of Series B funding led by Sequoia Ventures, the company is set to further grow 500% in the next 1 year, broadening its global footprint to 8 cities.

The Problem To Be Solved


Exponential business growth targets result in a huge manpower burden on the teams. Meanwhile, inefficiencies are increasingly a drag on portfolio growth and a low-hanging fruit. Board of directors requested to shorten project turnaround time by 50% to beef up bottom line.


Approach


I undertook the following approach to meet the project goals:


  1. Research:

    1. Qualitative Studies – stakeholder interviews and insight synthesis

    2. Quantitative Studies – analysis of CAPEX, man-hour and sales opportunity cost)

  2. Map current state of play:  

    1. Set up as-is service blueprint

  3. Align views across teams and ideation: 

    1. Through a series of workshops to challenge perceptions, storytell with persona, map future state process and ideate possible next steps

  4. Launch new process: 

    1. Curate marketing materials 

    2. Phased launches across different properties



Qualitative Studies


I led research interviews with 17 stakeholders across 5 teams. Through probing and asking the right questions, this method uncovered key information and tension points which were later converted into insights and personas (including behavioral archetypes)



Post-its

User persona
Example of a user persona

Stakeholders ecosystem map
Stakeholders ecosystem map

Quantitative Studies


I analysed the sales report and reasons for project delay to help quantify opportunity costs, serve as an easy post-roll out measurement of success and inform design research initiatives. These studies also helped ingrain a culture of learning amongst stakeholders and to encourage continual testing and iteration even after the launch.



Graph showing reasons for project delay
Reasons for project delay

Workshop : Team Alignment and Service Blueprints


I led the teams in a series of team alignment and mapping of new service blueprints workshops.










Outcome


An extensive strategic map of how to restructure the process and certain teams was created. Management team came to an  understanding that culture was weak and empathy levels were low amongst individuals in relation to understanding the business challenges faced by one another.


This project also opened up new conversations on inter-team synergies and business re-modelling. 


1 month since roll out date, entire process saw a 50% reduction in lead time.


Lessons Learnt


This was my first time leading a design team. I learnt to identify my team member’s strengths and delegate tasks strategically. Over the course of the project, I learnt to listen attentively to the concerns of management, while also steering them towards an understanding of the reality of problems that exist at the execution level, which they may have overlooked.

bottom of page